LAS Investigator Program – FAQs

The closed meeting investigation process pursuant to Sections 239.1 and 239.2 of the Municipal Act, 2001 is new. These “frequently asked questions” reflect our best efforts to interpret the legislation and its intent, and demonstrate how the new LAS Investigator Program will operate.

What is the new Requirement?

As of January 1, 2008 any person (and this means anyone) will be able to request that an investigation be undertaken respecting whether a municipality or local board, or a committee of either, has complied with closed meeting rules. Municipalities will be able to appoint an Investigator for this purpose. If a municipality chooses not to appoint an Investigator, the Provincial Ombudsman will be able to assume the role.

What should be considered in appointing an Investigator?

A municipality can appoint any person, corporation or individual, including a member of municipal staff, to conduct investigations pursuant to Section 239.2.

In making its selection of an Investigator, a municipal Council should consider the intent and wording of the Act. Sections 239.1 and 239.2 were enacted to enhance transparency and accountability. Council needs to consider if its choice achieves that goal.

The Act specifically speaks to impartiality, credibility, confidentiality, and independence with respect to the investigation process. Council must consider these factors also.

What is Local Authority Services (LAS)?

Created in 1992, LAS supports municipalities and the broader public sector by delivering programs and services that leverage economies-of-scale and co-operative procurement efforts. Examples of current LAS programs are our Electricity and Natural Gas Procurement Programs, and the ONE Funds Municipal Investment Program.

Although LAS is a wholly owned subsidiary of AMO, the corporation has independent governance through its own Board of Directors.

Who appoints an Investigator for a Local Board?

The municipal Council does. It will automatically be the one who is appointed to deal with requests regarding Council meetings.

What is a “Local Board”?

The definition of a local board is derived from two sources for purposes of closed meeting investigations. The first is Section 1 of the Municipal Act 2001, which says:

“Local Board” means a municipal services board, transportation commission, public library board, board of health, police services board, planning board, or any other board, commission, committee, body or local authority established or exercising any power under any act with respect to the affairs or purposes of one or more municipalities excluding a school board and a conservation authority”.

But Section 238, further states: ““local board” does not include police services boards or public library boards”.

In short, the closed meeting investigation process covers all Municipal Boards and Committees except: School Boards, Conservation Authorities, Police Services Boards, and Public Library Boards. These are the only exceptions – Business Improvement Area Boards, Arena Boards, Transit Commissions, and Boards of Health, for example, are all covered.

For a specific local situation not addressed above, the municipality should review the establishing by-law and enabling legislation for the Board or Committee, and if necessary consult its solicitor. Such situations would include a corporation established under the Section 203 of the Municipal Act 2001, for example. Other corporations may also be excluded by their enabling legislation.

What is a “Committee”?

Section 238 says that “committee means any advisory or other committee, subcommittee or similar entity of which at least 50% of the members are also members of one or more councils or local boards”.

What about Joint Boards and Committees?

Again, guidance should come from the by-laws and legislation creating the specific body.

Section 1 of the Act defines “local board” to mean, “a municipal service board, transportation commission, public library board, board of health, police services board, planning board, or any other board, commission, committee, body or local authority established or exercising any power under any Act with respect to the affairs or purposes of one or more municipalities, excluding a school board and a conservation authority;”.

Section 238(1) lists the exclusions for the Part of the Act that includes the closed meeting investigation process. The definitions of “local board” in sections 1 and 238 must be read together to what boards are covered by the closed meeting rules.

The Act is silent with respect to who will investigate in the case of a joint board such as a Board of Health. It would appear that if all of the municipalities appointing to the joint board have appointed the same Investigator, for example LAS, then that Investigator would investigate a request. Each municipality should include the joint board in its list of included boards. If however different municipalities have appointed different Investigators, then it is not clear which Investigator will respond. It is recommended that the joint board decide by resolution which Investigator is to be appointed. Again, this should be reflected in the municipal list of boards included in the program. Finally if one or more of the appointing municipalities has not appointed an Investigator and the Joint Board has not passed a resolution accepting the appointment of an Investigator of one of the appointing municipalities, it is likely that the Provincial Ombudsman will be the Investigator for the Joint Board’s situation.

What is a “Person”?

  • A “Person” includes an individual
  • “ “person” includes a corporation and the heirs, executors, administrators or other legal representatives of a person
    to whom the context can apply according to law.” (Legislation Act),
  • This was superseded by the Legislation Act, 2006 – Part VI, section 87, states “person” includes a corporation.
  • “ “person” includes a municipality unless the context otherwise requires;”
    (Municipal Act, 2001)

What happens if an Investigator is not appointed before January 1, 2008?

Effective January 1, 2008, a person may request the Provincial Ombudsman to undertake an investigation of the compliance of a closed meeting with the Municipal Act 2001 or a procedure by-law.

Even if a request has gone to the Ombudsman, the municipality could still appoint an Investigator for subsequent requests. The Ombudsman would complete the work on the requests filed with him.

Can a request be retroactive?

Section 239.2 of the Municipal Act, 2001 has been proclaimed effective January 1, 2008. As a general rule, legislation is not retroactive unless it contains specific reference to retroactivity. This section contains no such reference; it is recommended that an investigation only be held for meetings that occur on or after January 1, 2008.

How does a person file a request and is there a required form for a request?

It appears that the municipality can decide upon the form for a request, but presumably the request should be signed by the person requesting the investigation, and should include contact information and sufficient detail to indicate the meeting that the request concerns, and a general indication of why the request has been made.

What are the requirements of an Investigation?

The investigation process is required to be credible, its activities confidential, and it is required to be conducted impartially and independently. Neither Council, nor a Local Board, nor any of its members should attempt to provide direction to the investigation process once a request has been made. Council or Board members could be interviewed as could any other person in attendance at the meeting that is the subject of the request.

What does the Municipality or Local Board do with a request for an Investigation?

The request should be directed to the Municipal Clerk who will have a checklist of material required for each investigation – this will be provided by LAS. This standardized checklist is designed to minimize investigation costs and ensure the credibility of the investigation process.

The checklist will include: the request made by the person, procedure by-law(s), contact list of attendees, evidence of notice for the meeting in question, agenda and attachments, minutes, and other relevant materials.

What will the LAS investigation process be?

  • A person files a request for investigation with the Clerk
  • The request and background documentation are sent to the Investigator
  • Initial review by Investigator may result in withdrawal by the person filing, a decision not to proceed with reason, or a decision to proceed with the investigation
  • In the case of withdrawal, or decision not to proceed, Investigator notifies the parties.
  • If decision is to proceed, a Review Officer is assigned and investigation is performed
  • Draft report filed with Investigator for review
  • If circumstances warrant, municipality or local board given formal hearing opportunity (pursuant to Section 18 of the Ombudsman Act)
  • Final report prepared and submitted to the Council, or Local Board and Council, and posted on Investigator website.
  • A flowchart of the Investigation Request Process can be found on the LAS website at www.LAS.on.ca.

Will all requests proceed to a full investigation?

During the investigative process the person who filed the request may decide to withdraw the request. If that happens, the file will be closed and the action reported to the Council, or to the Council and Local Board.

In addition, some requests may be determined upon preliminary review to be frivolous or vexatious. Following such a determination the requestor will be notified of this decision by the Investigator as will the Council, or the Council and the Local Board.

The credibility of the Investigation process requires that both of the above circumstances be formally undertaken and documented.

Are all draft reports reviewed by more than one person?

Each draft report prepared by a Review Officer will be peer reviewed by Amberley Gavel. In most instances this will be undertaken by one of the principals of Amberley Gavel. There will be circumstances however where one of the other Review Officers will be requested to undertake the peer review. Only after the peer review has been completed will Amberley Gavel submit the report and any recommendations to the municipality or local board.

What are the fees for this LAS program?

There are two types of fees with respect to a municipality’s agreement with LAS. The first is the retainer fee, and the second is the daily rate for actual investigations, along with out of pocket expenses. Specific fee amounts are detailed in the Investigator Services Agreement.

The retainer is to allow for educational materials to be developed and provided to municipalities and local boards, and also for administrative overhead.

Daily fees and reasonable out of pocket expenses will be chargeable to the municipality or local board for each investigation. It is anticipated that a credible investigation process will require a minimum of a half day’s time once referred to the Investigator, even if the request is withdrawn or determined not to merit a complete investigation.

Does LAS benefit monetarily from offering this program?

LAS does not intend (nor expect) to generate material net revenue from providing this program. The retainer fee is based on cost recovery for LAS’ expenditures to establish and administer the program for participating municipalities.

How is the investigation billed?

Municipalities will be billed on a daily basis for investigations – billing will be on an hourly basis, where only part of a day is required. Members of the Review Officer panel will be located throughout Ontario which will help to reduce travel costs and time.

Is there a policy/guidelines related to the expenses that Amberley Gavel may charge for a Review Officer conducting an investigation?

The municipality or local board will be responsible for the reasonable expenses of conducting the investigation. Travel, meals and accommodation and administration, such as copying, will be the primary expenses. Amberley Gavel is committed to keeping out of pocket costs incurred as a result of the investigation at a reasonable level, consistent with expenses charged by firms and agencies consulting with governments.

Amberley Gavel’s current mileage allowance is 42 cents per kilometer, and economy airfare where practical, whichever is less. Meal costs will be in line with normal municipal practices as will accommodation reimbursement. An expense policy will be available for program members on the Amberley Gavel website.

How long will an investigation take?

The time spent on conducting an investigation will depend on a number of factors. It could be as short as a few hours to investigate a complaint that is on its face without merit or outside the scope or purpose of the closed meeting investigator. But it could also be a few working days depending upon a number of factors such as the complexity of the situation, the number of persons to be interviewed and the organization of interviews by the Review Officer and the municipality.

A straightforward investigation will likely take at least a month from the time that a request is received by Amberley Gavel along with all of the stipulated documentation. One critical element will be the availability of all of the persons that need to be interviewed being available to maximize the use of the Review Officer’s time. More complex situations may upwards of two months before a report is sent to the Municipal Council.

What would be investigated under a complaint?

The Act provides in section 239.1 that the mandate of the investigator is to determine whether a municipality or local board has complied with section 239 or the procedure by-law of the municipality or local board. The LAS program will review only the procedure as it relates to the acceptability of a closed meeting and not the issue at hand in the complaint.

Can a municipality charge a fee for a request for an investigation?

Nothing in section 239 addresses the issue of the fee, however, any fee or charge would presumably be established by the municipality or local board pursuant to Part XII of the Municipal Act, 2001. A municipality may wish to obtain legal advice in establishing such a fee.

Is there an appeal mechanism available for Investigator reports?

The Municipal Act, 2001 does not provide for an appeal of the report.

Does the Municipality have a choice of Review Officer from the panel?

The decision as to which Review Officer will be delegated the task of conducting the investigation will be made by LAS’ delegate – Amberley Gavel. Factors such as geographic location, type of municipality and availability will be taken into account.

Amberley Gavel will ensure that a Review Officer that has a conflict as a result of an existing relationship with a municipality or local board will not be involved in the investigation. If the municipality is aware of a conflict with any of the Review Officers, it should contact Amberley Gavel.

Who can see a request?

The Municipal Act, 2001 imposes a duty of confidentiality on every person involved with the Investigation. This duty prevails even over the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.

Is the report of the Investigator available to the public?

Yes. The Act requires that it be available to the public.

If a municipality appoints LAS will it have access to all of the reports?

Yes. One of the advantages for a municipality in appointing LAS is that the municipality will have access to a password protected website that will include all reports issued.

How long does the appointment of LAS as Investigator last?

For appointments made effective January 1, 2008, the sample Appointing By-law and Services Agreement provide for a term of two years expiring on December 31, 2009. If the appointment is made after January 1, 2008, the appointment will still last until December 31, 2009.

The appointment will be automatically renewed unless terminated by the municipality or by LAS no later than 90 days before the expiry date of the current Services Agreement.

How will LAS help municipalities understand the closed meeting rules?

LAS will enhance the service provided to participating municipalities in a number of ways:

  • There will be a password protected website for participating municipalities that will provide a variety of information resources including access to all reports made to date.
  • LAS will provide information on the panel of Review Officers.
  • LAS will also provide information and suggestions on closed meetings as part of an ongoing educational program.

When and how will educational materials be made available to program members?

Educational materials will be posted on the Amberley Gavel website in a password protected area available to client municipalities and their local boards. All participating municipalities will be provided with a password and access to this secure site in advance of January 1, 2008.